Archive for the ‘Case Summaries’ Category

Corporation filing an evction without an attorney

March 10, 2009


//<![CDATA[
function JOT_insertRelDate(timestamp, absTimeStr) {
var relTimeStr = JOT_formatRelativeToNow(timestamp);
if (relTimeStr) {
document.write('<span timestamp="' + timestamp + '" title="' + absTimeStr+'">' + relTimeStr+'</span>');
} else {
document.write(absTimeStr);
}
}
//]]>
In 901 Pompano LLC vs. Person1 the landlord was a corporation and filed the eviction without being represented by an attorney.

The court dismissed the landlord’s complaint without leave to amend because the complaint was filed by an employee of the corporation. The court reasoned that the corporation, as a fictitious entity, cannot represent itself in an eviction. The court held that corporations must be represented by legal counsel in eviction actions.

1 901 Pompano LLC vs. Person, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 268a (Fla. 17th Cty. Ct. Dec. 9, 2008).

Jaisen J. Stango, Esq.

Landlord / Tenant Attorney

617 E Washington St Ste 3

Orlando, FL 32801

Ph (407) 835-8688

http://www.Orlando-Evictions.com
The information in this article amounts to general statements regarding Florida Law and is not to be taken as direct legal advice regarding your specific situation. To determine the applicability of the Florida Laws that govern your specific situation, you must seek legal advice from an attorney or research the Florida Law for yourself. Florida Laws are subject to change and, furthermore, are subject to court interpretation. Therefore, the information in this article is subject to change without notice.

When may a commerical landlord withhold consent to an assignment?

November 12, 2008

Common contract language used in a commercial lease regarding the assignability of the leasehold interest is:

“Tenant may not assign this rental agreement without the written consent of the Landlord.”

The inevitable consequence of such a provision is that it does not explain when the Landlord may and may not lawfully withhold its consent to the assignment.

In Fernandez v. Vazquez, 397 So.2d 1171 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), the lease contained a similar provision. The issue before the court was whether a commercial landlord with the power to withhold consent to an assignment can withhold that consent for any reason whatsoever. The Tenant in Fernandez entered into an agreement to sell its business, however the Landlord refused to consent to the assignment unless the buyer agreed to pay an additional $250 per month in rent. The buyer refused and rescinded the purchase and sale contract. In response to a subsequent eviction action, the Tenant counterclaimed alleging the Landlord breached the lease by refusing to consent to the assignment.

The court held that when a Tenant agrees to limit its right to assign the lease without prior consent of the Landlord, that consent should not be unreasonably withheld. The court reasoned that a lease is a contract and, therefore, should be governed by the contract principles of good faith and commercial reasonableness. The court further explained that a withholding of consent to an assignment is unreasonable (i.e., a breach of the lease) when it fails the tests for good faith and commercial reasonableness. The court stated that in determining the reasonableness of the withholding of consent by a landlord, the factors to be considered are:

  1. the financial stability of the proposed subtenant
  2. the suitability of the proposed subtenant for the particular building
  3. the need for alteration of the premises
  4. the legality of the proposed use
  5. the nature of the occupancy, (i.e., residential, commercial, office, retail, etc.)

If you have any questions regarding the legitimacy of a refusal to consent to an assignment of a lease, please call my office at (407) 835-8688 for more information.

Jaisen J. Stango, Esq.

Landlord / Tenant Attorney

617 E Washington St Ste 3

Orlando, FL 32801

Ph (407) 835-8688

http://www.Orlando-Evictions.com

LEGAL DISCLAIMER: Please be cautioned and advised that the information on this site amounts to general statements regarding Florida Landlord Tenant Law and is not to be taken as direct legal advice regarding your specific situation. This site is not to be taken as a substitute for researching and reading Florida Landlord Tenant Law for yourself. This site is not intended to create and shall not constitute the creation of an attorney-client relationship. To determine the applicability of the Florida Laws that govern your specific situation, you must seek legal advice from an attorney or research the Florida Statutes and case law for yourself. Please note that Florida Laws are subject to change and, furthermore, are subject to court interpretation. Therefore, the information on this site is subject to change without notice.

Covelli Family, L.P. v. Abg5, L.L.C. (Fla. App., 2008)

November 11, 2008

A Tenant becomes a “holdover tenant” if that Tenant remains in possession of the premises either after the expiration of a rental agreement or the valid termination of the tenancy by the Landlord. Accordingly, the period is which the tenant remains in possession after the expiration or valid termination of the rental agreement is the “holdover period.” Under Florida Law (s. 83.06 & 83.58 ), the Landlord may be entitled to double rent during the holdover period.

However, under certain circumstances, a Tenant may remain in possession of the premises after the expiration of a rental agreement or the valid termination of the tenancy and not be deemed a holdover tenant. Under Florida Law, a Tenant that remains in possession under a bona fide claim of right is not a holdover tenant. See Greentree Amusement Arcade, Inc. v. Greenacres Development Corp., 401 So.2d 915 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).

In Covelli Family, L.P. v. Abg5, L.L.C., the property was damagesd by two hurricanes. The Landlord terminated the rental agreement under the “damage or destruction” provision, which permitted the Landlord to terminate the rental agreement if the cost to repair the building exceeded 20% of the insurable value. However, the Tenant remained in possession of the premises claiming the Landlord failed to obtain estimates from “reputable” contractors. The trial court found in favor of the Landlord and awarded the Landlord double rent during the holdover period

On appeal, the Court held that is was in error to award the Landlord double rent because the Tenant had a “well-founded claim of possession” and, therefore, was not a holdover tenant. The Court noted that, similar to Greentree Amusement Arcade, Inc. v. Greenacres Development Corp, the Tenant remained in possession under an injunction awarded by the trial court. Furthermore, the Court also pointed out that the Landlord’s actions of first using an unlicensed contractor added to the legitimacy of the Tenant’s challenge to the termination.

If you have any questions about Florida Landlord / Tenant Law, please call my office at (407) 835-8688.

Jaisen J. Stango, Esq.

Landlord / Tenant Attorney

617 E Washington St Ste 3

Orlando, FL 32801

Ph (407) 835-8688

http://www.Orlando-Evictions.com

LEGAL DISCLAIMER: Please be cautioned and advised that the information on this site amounts to general statements regarding Florida Landlord Tenant Law and is not to be taken as direct legal advice regarding your specific situation. This site is not to be taken as a substitute for researching and reading Florida Landlord Tenant Law for yourself. This site is not intended to create and shall not constitute the creation of an attorney-client relationship. To determine the applicability of the Florida Laws that govern your specific situation, you must seek legal advice from an attorney or research the Florida Statutes and case law for yourself. Please note that Florida Laws are subject to change and, furthermore, are subject to court interpretation. Therefore, the information on this site is subject to change without notice.

Greentree Amusement Arcade, Inc. v. Greenacres Development Corp.,

November 11, 2008

A “Holdover Tenancy” arises when the Tenant remains in possession of the premises after the expiration of the rental agreement or after the lawful termination of the rental agreement by the Landlord. Under Florida Law (s. 83.06 & 83.58 ), the Tenant may be liable for double rent during the holdover period.

However, even if the Landlord lawfully terminated the rental agreement, the Tenant may be relieved of the obligation to pay double rent during the Holdover Period so long as the Tenant remained in possession under a bona fide claim of right. See Greentree Amusement Arcade, Inc. v. Greenacres Development Corp., 401 So.2d 915 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).

In Greentree, the lease required the Tenant to maintain the premises in an orderly fashion. However, because the Tenant’s patrons were “rowdy, unruly, and generally disruptive,” the Landlord alleged this conduct constituted a material breach of the lease and, therefore, terminated the rental agreement. The trial court found the Landlord’s termination of the lease was justifiable and awarded the Landlord damages in the amount of double rent during the holdover period.

On appeal, the Court held that although there was a valid termination of the lease, the Tenant was not a holdover tenant because the Tenant had a bona fide claim of possession. The Court’s rationale was

despite the fact that the trial court correctly found that the landlord had validly terminated the lease option, the validity of that termination remained a genuine and justiciable issue up to the time that the final judgment was entered.

However, the Court noted that the Tenant’s possession of the premises was (1) authorized by an injunction awarded by the trial court and (2) the Tenant continued to pay the normal rent due under the rental agreement until the Tenant vacated the premises.

If you have any questions about Florida Landlord / Tenant Law, please call my office at (407) 835-8688.

Jaisen J. Stango, Esq.

Landlord / Tenant Attorney

617 E Washington St Ste 3

Orlando, FL 32801

Ph (407) 835-8688

http://www.Orlando-Evictions.com

LEGAL DISCLAIMER: Please be cautioned and advised that the information on this site amounts to general statements regarding Florida Landlord Tenant Law and is not to be taken as direct legal advice regarding your specific situation. This site is not to be taken as a substitute for researching and reading Florida Landlord Tenant Law for yourself. This site is not intended to create and shall not constitute the creation of an attorney-client relationship. To determine the applicability of the Florida Laws that govern your specific situation, you must seek legal advice from an attorney or research the Florida Statutes and case law for yourself. Please note that Florida Laws are subject to change and, furthermore, are subject to court interpretation. Therefore, the information on this site is subject to change without notice.